Lewis Wharf, Bay 228 | Boston, MA. 02110   Tel: (617) 723-3777     Fax: (617) 723-7876   
 
Memoranda & Articles
Capital Gain vs. Ordinary Income
Exchanging with Related Parties
FIRPTA Regulations Now Require Tax ID Numbers
The Marital Residence: Who Benefits from the Sale and Deductions?
New law alters relationships among brokers, buyers and sellers
Reverse Exchanges
Bankruptcy and The Homestead Act
Zoning Impediments
Misrepresentation of Location
Rental Unit Delivery Standards Checklist
Will the Sub-Prime Mortgages Effect Boston’s Market?
Lemon Law
 
   
  Exchanging with Related Parties
 
  Selling property to a related party: A taxpayer may sell relinquished property to a related party. However, there is a 2 year holding requirement imposed by IRS Section 1031(f). Specifically, the related party must hold the relinquished property for 2 years and the exchanger must hold the replacement property for 2 years, otherwise the exchange will fail.

CAVEAT: If a taxpayer buys replacement property from an unrelated party, but that same replacement property was - within 2 years preceding the taxpayer's acquisition - owned by a related party, the transaction will be disqualified. Additionally, if a related party has owned any property involved in the exchange within a 2 year period before the exchange, the exchange may be disqualified.

Purchasing property from a related property: IRS Section 1031(f) implies that a taxpayer may purchase property from a related party; however, in a recent revenue ruling - namely, Rev. Rul. 2002-83 issued November 25, 2002 - the IRS clearly states that a taxpayer may not buy replacement property from a related party and have the transaction qualify for nonrecognition of gain. As such, it is not advisable to purchase property from a related party.

Swapping property with a related party: exchangers may swap property with a related party. The transaction, however, is subject to the same year holding requirement.

  • IRS Section 267(b) defines "Related Parties" as follows:
  • Members of the same family (including spouses, brothers and sisters, whether by whole or half blood, ancestors and lineal descendants);
  • Step-parents, uncles, aunts, in-laws, cousins, nephews, nieces and former spouses are not related parties
  • An individual and a corporation, if the individual owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the corporation,
    An individual and a partnership, if the individual owns directly or indirectly, more than 50% of the capital interest of the partnership;
  • A corporation and a partnership, if Taxpayer owns, directly or indirectly, more than 50% of each;
  • A Grantor and a fiduciary of the same trust;
  • A fiduciary and the fiduciary of another trust, if both trusts have common grantors;
  • A fiduciary and beneficiary of the same trust;
  • A fiduciary of a trust and corporation, where more than 50% of the stock is owned directly or indirectly, by or for the trust, or by or for a person who is the grantor of the trust;
  • Two partnerships, if one person owns more than 50% of each;
  • A two person and a Section 501 organization, if the person or their family control the organization;
  • Two sub S corporations that are controlled by one person, directly or indirectly, or
  • Two corporations where one is sub S and the other is a C corp that are controlled by one person, directly or indirectly

Example #1
Father wants to buy property from corporation which stock is owned 51% by son. Father and corporation are related entities because father will be considered to constructively (indirectly through son) own 51% of the corporation.

Example #2
Father wants to buy property from a corporation whose stock is owned 50% by the son. Related party rule will not apply because father only deemed the constructive owner of 50% of the corporation. The son must own more than 50% of the corporation to trigger the related party rules.

   
© Copyright 2007 - John M. Iacoi & Associates
Home   |   Services   |   Memorandum   |   About the Firm   |   Lighter Side of the Law   |   Contact